A Cultural Study of Evasive Answers in the SinoUS Press Conference“閃避回答”的文化研究——以中美新聞發(fā)言為例
定 價(jià)：48 元
當(dāng)前圖書已被 1 所學(xué)校薦購過！
查看明細(xì)
- 作者：錢亞旭, 張秦, 著
- 出版時(shí)間：2019/1/1
- ISBN：9787564368593
- 出 版 社：西南交通大學(xué)出版社
- 中圖法分類：K825.46；K828.4
- 頁碼：145頁
- 紙張：膠版紙
- 版次：1
- 開本：16K
本書為研究閃避回答在不同文化語境中使用模式和特點(diǎn)的全英文學(xué)術(shù)著作。閃避回答是在公開正式場合遇到尖銳問題和不方便即時(shí)回答的情況時(shí)常為發(fā)言人所采用的一種策略。本書首先總結(jié)前人相關(guān)研究，明確了閃避回答的定義、分類和功能，繼而基于合作原則和關(guān)聯(lián)理論指出使用閃避回答的必要性以及常用的幾種模式，之后結(jié)合中國和美國新聞發(fā)言中的實(shí)例說明不同國家在使用閃避回答時(shí)的不同特點(diǎn)，并試著分析其歷史、文化等根源。書稿的特點(diǎn)在于從重建（增加、減少、轉(zhuǎn)變）語境和利用語境角度總結(jié)了閃避回答的使用模式，并將問與答作為一個整體來加以研究。
Chapter One Introduction
1．1 Research Object and Objective
1．2 Research Methodology and Theoretical Framework
1．3 Research Significance
1．4 Outline of the Book
Chapter Two Literature Review and Conceptual Construction
2．1 Studies on Diplomatic Discourse in Press Conferences
2．2 Classifications of Evasiveness
2．2．1 What Is "Questioning and Answering"?
2．2．2 Working Definition of Questioning Types
2．2．3 Definitions of Evasive Answers in the Existing Studies
2．2．4 Working Classification of Evasive Answers
2．3 Definition of Evasive Answers
2．3．1 Motivational Dimension of Evasion
2．3．2 Functional Dimension of Evasion
2．3．3 Dimension of the Relation to Questioning
2．3．4 Working Definition of Evasive Answers
Chapter Three Methodology
3．1 Previous Approaches to Evasive Answers
3．1．1 The Semantic Approach
3．1．2 The Functional Approach
3．2 Data Collections and Research Objectives
……
Chapter Four The Theoretical Framework
Chapter Five Cognitive Pragmatic Analysis of Evasive Answers in Press Conferences
Chapter Six Evasive Strategies to Different Questions in Press Conferences
Chapter Seven Pragmatic Functions of Evasive Answers in Press
Chapter Eight The Comparative Analysis of Evasive Strategies in Sino-US Press Conferences
Chapter Nine The Cultural Analysis of the Evasive Differentiations in Sino-US Press Conferences
Chapter Ten Conclusion
Bibliography
《“閃避回答”的文化研究：以中美新聞發(fā)言為例（英文）》：
Although some approaches are intended to explain and analyze the evasive answer inprevious years such as the semantic theory and the functional theory， this book investigates it from a different perspective on the basis of previous researches， that is， a cognitive pragmatic study. The study of evasive answer is of theoretical significance because a new theory-the relevance theory is applied to this research， and it is also of applicable importance because evasion is a common strategy used by politicians to deal with sticky questions. The cultural interpretation， then， could further explain the value differentiation and similarities between the manifestations of Sino-US diplomatic discourses. During those explorations， different theories from the interdisciplinary perspective would be applies in the data observation and analysis. Theories of identity， nationalism as well as cognitive pragmatics could be used to shed light on the research object.
As for the cognitive theoretical framework， since this study intends to explain how cognitive context works in our minds to successfully generate the evasive answer， the intended theoretical value is to refine theories on evasive answers， which could enable us to access to a better understanding of the conception of evasiveness. Because this study is intended to abstract a model of evasively answering under the guideline of the Relevance Theory， in this sense， the present study will also be contributed to the possible significance of theoretical construction.
Besides， this theoretical significance could directly bring about the applicable significance. As to application， the present study will also provide diplomatic respondents with ostensive information to tackle different questions， especially those implicational leading questions. In other words， it will also show how to use those theories in real political environments to become a better spokesperson or politician， especially in the circumstances of Sino-US cultural comparisons and contrasts. Thus， the present book will also be of some applicable significance by suggesting concrete ways to solve the answering problems in political context.
4.1 Discussions on the Basis of Framework
The purpose of the present chapter is to present and explain the conceptual framework that is developed via observing and examining the data collected for the present study. It starts with a brief synopsis of the problems in the existing studies on evasion so as to lay the foundation and to understand the necessity of our proposing a conceptual framework of evasion from the cognitive pragmatic perspective. The present conceptual framework， intends to explain how answerers can successfully use evasive strategies via the Relevance Theory， and the concept of cognitive context in Relevance Theory will be attempted to develop by the application in analyzing evasive strategies in diplomatic discourses， Thus， we can further analyze the mechanism underlying evasion in it.
……
書單推薦
